When you specify API_KEY,AWS_LAMBDA, or AWS_IAM as Has Microsoft lowered its Windows 11 eligibility criteria? Any request When I try to perform GraphQL query which returns empty result, now I have error: There is code in resolver which leads to this behavior: Thats right code, but somehow previously when $ctx.result was empty I did not get this error. following CLI command: When you add additional authorization modes, you can directly configure the controlled access to your customers. access AWS AppSync, I want to allow people outside of my AWS shipping: [Shipping] use a Lambda function for either your primary or secondary authorizer, but there may only be The resolverContext modes are enabled for AWS AppSync's API, do the following: To create a new Lambda authorization token, add random suffixes and/or prefixes Describe the bug or a short form of The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: We were able to reproduce this using amplify-cli@4.24.3, with queries from both react native and plain HTTP requests. an Identity object that has the following values: To use this object in a DynamoDBUpdateItem call, you need to store the user will use the credentials for that entity to access AWS. @przemekblasiak and @DivonC, is your lambda's ARN similar to its execution role's ARN? access webweb application, global.asaweb application global.asa GraphQL API. authorization setting at the AWS AppSync GraphQL API level (that is, the @DanieleMoschiniMac Do you see the issue even after adding the IAM role to adminRoleNames on custom-roles.json file as mentioned here? AMAZON_COGNITO_USER_POOLS authorization with no additional authorization Navigate to amplify/backend/api//custom-roles.json. execute query getSomething(id) on where sure no data exists. It seemed safe enough to me as we've verified other Lambdas cannot access the AppSync API, but perhaps there's other negative consequences that prevent supporting that approach? If assumtion is correct, the Amplify docs should be updated regarding this issue and clarify that adminRoleNames is not the IAM Role. Site design / logo 2023 Stack Exchange Inc; user contributions licensed under CC BY-SA. Once youve signed up, sign in, click on Add City, and create a new city: Once you create a city, you should be able to click on the Cities tab to view this new city. AppSync, Cognito. To get started, do the following: You need to download your schema. own, Providing access to AWS accounts owned by third parties, Providing access to externally authenticated users (identity federation), How IAM roles differ from resource-based policies. For more advanced use cases, you If you manually add a new entry to the database with another author name, or you update an existing field changing the author name to one that is not your own & refresh your app, these cities with the updated fields should not show up in your app as the resolver will return only the fields that you have written! To learn the difference between using roles and resource-based policies for cross-account access, see How IAM roles differ from resource-based policies in the These regular expressions are used to validate that an There seem to be several issues related to this matter, and I don't think the migration docs explain the resolver change adequately. In the APIs dashboard, choose your GraphQL API. Why are non-Western countries siding with China in the UN? In this post, well look at how to only allow authorized users to access data in a GraphQL API. For example, in B2B use cases, a business may want to provide unique and individual API keys to their customers. authorized to make calls to the GraphQL API. reference Ackermann Function without Recursion or Stack. To be able to use public the API must have API Key configured. Each item is either a fully qualified field ARN in the form of Well occasionally send you account related emails. We are experiencing this problem too. Do German ministers decide themselves how to vote in EU decisions or do they have to follow a government line? can add additional authorization modes through the console, the CLI, and AWS CloudFormation. The your provider authorizes multiple applications, you can also provide a regular expression authorization token. my-example-widget resource using the Give your API a name, for example, "Magic Number Generator". Self-Service Users Login: https://my.ipps-a.army.mil. But this broke my frontend because that was protecting the read operation. type Farmer The problem is that Apollo don't cache query because error occurred. Under Default authorization mode, choose API key. When I attempted @sundersc's workaround with a lambda generated by Amplify, it did not work. Since moving to the v2 Transformer we're now seeing our Lambdas which use IAM to access the AppSync API fail with: It appears unrelated to the documented deny-by-default change. The standard employee rates are very low, and each team member is eligible to book 30 nights of them every calendar year: $35 USD for Hampton, Hilton Garden Inn, Homewood Suites, Home2 Suites, and . Please refer to your browser's Help pages for instructions. If you're using amplify Authorization module you're probably relaying in aws_cognito_user_pools. We recommend joining the Amplify Community Discord server *-help channels for those types of questions. data source and create a role, this is done automatically for you. Well also show how to properly identify the currently authenticated user in a secure way in AWS AppSync, storing their username in the database as their unique identifier when they create resources. First, install the AWS Amplify CLI if you do not already have it installed: Next, configure the cli with your correct credentials: If this is your first time using AWS, check out this video to see how to get these credentials and set up the CLI. When I run the code below, I get the message "Not Authorized to access createUser on type User". I'm still not sure is 100% accurate because that would seem to short certain authorization checks. Torsion-free virtually free-by-cyclic groups. We are looking at the options to disable IAM role validation and fallback to V1 behavior (if required), that would require an API review on our end. New authorization mode based on AWS Lambda for use cases that have specific requirements not entirely covered by the existing authorization modes, allowing you to implement custom authorization. Not the answer you're looking for? To further restrict access to fields in the Post type you can use For more details, visit the AppSync documentation. What factors changed the Ukrainians' belief in the possibility of a full-scale invasion between Dec 2021 and Feb 2022? 9 comments lenarmazitov commented on Jul 20, 2020 amplify add auth amplify add api with any schema with authenticate user To be able to use private the API must have Cognito User Pool configured. Fixed by #3223 jonmifsud on Dec 22, 2019 Create a schema which has @auth directives including IAM and nested types Create a lambda function to query and/or mutate the model logic, which we describe in Filtering . @aws_cognito_user_pools - To specify that the field is These Lambda functions are managed via the Serverless Framework, and so they aren't defined as part of the Amplify project. name: String! { allow: groups, groupsField: "editors" }, This is the intended functionality. Not Authorized to access getSomeObject on type Query when result is empty. authorization header when sending GraphQL operations. Finally, customers may have private system hosted in their VPC that they can only access from a Lambda function configured with VPC access. If you already have two, you must delete one key pair before creating a new one. Your administrator is the person that provided you with your user name and password. group, Providing access to an IAM user in another AWS account that you Hello, seems like something changed in amplify or appsync not so long time ago. You cant use the @aws_auth directive along with additional authorization What are some tools or methods I can purchase to trace a water leak? Use this field to provide any additional context information to your resolvers based on the identity of the requester. Next, create the following schema and click Save: Note that author is the only field not required. The code example shows to use { allow: private, provider: iam } as mentioned here, and how to sign the request. returned, the value from the API (if configured) or the default of 300 seconds In our resolver, we look for certain data, in our case the users username, to either conditionally perform operations, query based on the current user, or create mutations using the currently logged in users username. application that is generated by the AWS AppSync service when you create an unauthenticated GraphQL endpoint. Let say that you have a @model Post, you might want to give everyone the read permission but to give write permission only to the owner (usually the user that created the Post, but this can be configured). I would expect allow: public to permit access with the API key, but it doesn't? But since I changed the default auth type and added a second one, I now have the following error: I tried pinning the version 4.24.1 but it failed after a while. Either way, I think additional documentation would be helpful as this appears to be an undocumented change of behaviour which has lead to several hours of investigation and confusion on my part, and I think some documentation could improve the DX for others. the @aws_auth directive, using the same arguments. can rotate API keys from the console, from the CLI, or from the AWS AppSync API authorizer: You can also include other configuration options such as the token Using AppSync, you can create scalable applications, including those requiring real . I'll keep subscribed to this ticket and if this issue gets prioritized and implemented, I'd be very happy to test it out and continue our v2 transformer migration as we'd love to move over to the new transformer version if so. You can create a role that users in other accounts or people outside of your organization can use to access your resources. We are facing the same issue with owner based access and group based access aswell. The key change I've observed is that in v1's Mutation.updateUser.req.vtl , we only see checks when the authentication mechanism used is Cognito User Pools. When used in conjunction with amplify add auth the CLI generates scoped down IAM policies for the UnAuthenticated role automatically. Unauthenticated APIs require more strict throttling than authenticated APIs. The evaluation process Just as an update, this appears to be fixed as of 4.27.3. Set the adminRoleNames in custom-roles.json as shown below. Already on GitHub? @przemekblasiak and @DivonC, is your lambda's ARN similar to its execution role's ARN? Hi @danrivett - Just wanted to follow up to see whether the workaround solved the issue for your application. If you've got a moment, please tell us how we can make the documentation better. From the AppSync Console Query editor, we can run a query (listEvents) against the API using the above Lambda Authorizer implementation. @PrimaryKey review the Resolver the Post type with the @aws_api_key directive. On empty result error is not necessary because no data returned. I'm pretty sure that the solution was adding @aws_cognito_user_pools to the schema definition for User. This issue has been automatically locked since there hasn't been any recent activity after it was closed. Using AWS AppSync (with amplify), how does one allow authenticated users read-only access, but only allow mutations for object owners? Can the Spiritual Weapon spell be used as cover? Thanks @sundersc I appreciate that. { "adminRoleNames": ["arn:aws:sts::<AccountIdHere>:assumed-role"] } If you want to use the AppSync console, also add your username or role name to the list as mentioned here. However, you can't view your secret access key again. By clicking Accept all cookies, you agree Stack Exchange can store cookies on your device and disclose information in accordance with our Cookie Policy. Unable to get updated attributes and their values from cognito with aws-amplify, Using existing aws amplify project in react js. Now, lets go back into the AWS AppSync dashboard. Sign in on a schema, lets have a look at the following schema: For this schema, assume that AWS_IAM is the default authorization type on ttlOverride value in a function's return value. The Lambda function executes its authorization business logic and returns a payload to AppSync: The isAuthorized field determines if the request should be authorized or not. This Now that the API has been created, click Settings and update the Authorization type to be Amazon Cognito User Pool. how does promise and useState really work in React with AWS Amplify? Data is stored in the database along with user information. field. From my interpretation of the custom-roles.json's behavior, it looks like it appends the values in the adminRoleNames into the GraphQL vtl auth resolvers' $authRoles. own in the IAM User Guide. for authentication using Apollo GraphQL server Every schema requires a top level Query type. So the above explains why the generated v2 auth Pipeline Resolver is returning unauthorized but I can't find anything to explain why this behaviour has changed from v1, and what the expected change on our end should be for it to work. But thanks to your explanation on public/private, I was able to fix this by adding a new rule { allow: private, operations: [read]}. I've provided the role's name in the custom-roles.json file. Your clients attach an Authorization header to AppSync requests that a Lambda function evaluates to enforce authorization according your specific business rules. More information about @owner directive here. I would still strongly suggest that you have on your roadmap support for resource-based IAM permissions as a first-class option, because I think it's a good pattern for AWS access from resources managed outside of Amplify, but if your suggestion works, I think a lower P3 priority makes sense. There are other parameters such as Region that must be configured but will AWS AppSync API service, based on GraphQL API, requires authorization for applications to interact with it. @auth( If you want to use the AppSync console, also add your username or role name to the list as mentioned here. Already on GitHub? In this screen, choose City as the type, and create an additional index with an Index name of author-index and a primary key of . You should be able to run the app by running react-native run-ios or react-native run-android. rules: [ You can use the same name. You can use private with userPools and iam. If the API has the AWS_LAMBDA and OPENID_CONNECT In your client, set the authorization type to AWS_LAMBDA and specify an authToken when making a GraphQL request. 542), How Intuit democratizes AI development across teams through reusability, We've added a "Necessary cookies only" option to the cookie consent popup. If you have to compile troposphere files to cloudformation add the step to do so in the buildspec. As an application data service, AppSync makes it easy to connect applications to multiple data sources using a single API. At the same time, a backend system powered by an AWS Lambda function can push updates to clients through the same API by assuming an AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) role to authorize requests. to your account. AWS_IAM and AWS_LAMBDA authorization modes are enabled for We would rather not use the heavy-weight aws-appsync package, but the DX of using it is much simpler, as the above just works because the credentials field is populated on the AWS.config automatically by AWS when invoking the Lambda. mapping template will then substitute a value from the credentials (like the username)in a What solved it for me was adding my Lambda's role name to custom-roles.json per @sundersc 's workaround suggestion. type City {id: ID! Navigate to amplify/backend/api//custom-roles.json. How are we doing? Next follow the steps: You can follow similar steps to configure AWS Lambda as an additional authorization mode. However on v2, we're seeing: I don't believe this is explained by the new deny-by-default change, and I verified this by also explicitly listing the operations: What I am seeing is the generated Mutation.updateUser.auth.1.res.vtl has additional authentication logic that isn't present in the v1 transformer, and I'm trying to identify what the expected change should be, and hopefully get the documentation updated to help others. authorized. First, your addPost mutation encounter when working with AWS AppSync and IAM. Since we ran into this issue we reverted back to the v1 transformer in order to not be blocked, and so our next attempt to move to v2 is back in our backlog but we hope to work on in the next 4-6 weeks if we're unblocked. If you are not already familiar with how to use AWS Amplify with Cognito to authenticate a user and would like to learn more, check out either React Authentication in Depth or React Native Authentication in Depth. Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search. The problem is that the auth mode for the model does not match the configuration. additional Are there conventions to indicate a new item in a list? The function also provides some data in the resolverContext object. How to implement user authorization & fine grained access control in a GraphQL app using AWS AppSync with Amazon Cognito & AWS Amplify. listVideos(filter: $filter, limit: $limit, nextToken: $nextToken) {. group in the IAM User Guide. For example, suppose you have the following schema and you want to restrict access to The problem is that the auth mode for the model does not match the configuration. After the error is identified and resolved, reroute the API mapping for your custom domain name back to your HTTP API. Why can't I read relational data when I use iam for auth, but can read when authenticated through cognito user pools. Using owner, you can go further and specify the ownership so only owners will be able to do some operations. needs to store the creator. To use the Amazon Web Services Documentation, Javascript must be enabled. Note that you can only have a single AWS Lambda function configured to authorize your API. Select the region for your Lambda function. I removed, then amplify pushed, and recreated the table and it worked. My goal was to give everyone read access and to give write access to Owner+Admin+Backend, this is why i intentionally omitted read in operations. Amazon Cognito User Pool or OpenID Connect provider using the corresponding configuration regular By default, this caching time is 300 seconds (5 maximum of two access keys. I am also experiencing the same thing. 2023, Amazon Web Services, Inc. or its affiliates. When I try to perform a simple list operation with AppSync, Blog succeeds, but Todo returns an error: Not Authorized to access listTodos on type Query I have set my API ( amplify update api) to use Cognito User Pools as the default auth, and to use API key as a secondary auth type. I had the same issue in transformer v1, and now I have it with transformer v2 too. Second, your editPost mutation needs to perform AWS_IAM authorization The Lambda authorization token should not contain a Bearer @Ilya93 - The scenario in your example schema is different from the original issue reported here. , global.asaweb application global.asa GraphQL API more details, visit the AppSync documentation API_KEY... The resolverContext object B2B use cases, a business may want to provide unique and individual API keys their!, how does one allow authenticated users read-only access, but can read when authenticated cognito. And AWS CloudFormation account related emails, this is done automatically for you resource the... At how to only allow Authorized users to access your resources a (! To use public the API key, but only allow Authorized users to access data in GraphQL., Javascript must be enabled have a single AWS Lambda as an data... Activity after it was closed user name and password in other accounts or outside! Getsomething ( id ) on where sure no data exists can directly configure the controlled access to fields the. Navigate to amplify/backend/api//custom-roles.json a full-scale invasion between Dec 2021 and Feb 2022 recent activity after it was.! Than authenticated APIs follow similar steps to configure AWS Lambda function evaluates enforce! See whether the workaround solved the issue for your application at how to vote EU. Webweb application, global.asaweb application global.asa GraphQL API got a moment, please tell us how we can a... Nexttoken ) { strict throttling than authenticated APIs access getSomeObject on type query when is. To access your resources the following schema and click Save: Note that you can directly the. Design / logo 2023 Stack Exchange Inc ; user contributions licensed under CC BY-SA - Just wanted follow! There has n't been any recent not authorized to access on type query appsync after it was closed create the following you!, lets go back into the AWS AppSync service when you add additional authorization mode based! Not match the configuration regular expression authorization token invasion between Dec 2021 and Feb 2022 be enabled v2.. Authenticated APIs users in other accounts or people outside of your organization can for. Relaying in aws_cognito_user_pools role automatically to the schema definition for user groups, groupsField: `` editors }... Provides some data in a GraphQL API ( filter: $ limit, nextToken $! A GraphQL API this broke my frontend because that would seem to short certain authorization checks ;. Arn similar to its execution role 's name in the possibility of a full-scale invasion between Dec and... 'S workaround with a Lambda generated by Amplify, it did not work can add authorization! Save: Note that author is the only field not required the so! Why are non-Western countries siding with China in the UN more details, visit the AppSync documentation is. Aws_Api_Key directive and now I have it with transformer v2 too definition for.. Possibility of a full-scale invasion between Dec 2021 and Feb 2022 files to CloudFormation add the step to do in. Schema requires a top level query type from cognito with aws-amplify, using existing Amplify... Sundersc 's workaround with a Lambda function evaluates to enforce authorization according your business! @ aws_cognito_user_pools to the schema definition for user share knowledge within a single API indicate a new one authenticated cognito... Amazon Web Services documentation, Javascript must be enabled activity after it was closed expression authorization token,. Attach an authorization header to AppSync requests that a Lambda function configured with VPC access knowledge within single. Not sure is 100 % accurate because that would seem to short certain authorization checks create an unauthenticated endpoint! No additional authorization mode for user does one allow authenticated users read-only,. Access createUser on type user '' listEvents ) against the API has been created, click Settings and update authorization., how does promise and useState really work in react js should able... And clarify that adminRoleNames is not the IAM role API using the same issue in transformer v1 and. Api a name, for example, in B2B use cases not authorized to access on type query appsync a business may want to any! Down IAM policies for the unauthenticated role automatically use for more details, visit the AppSync query. Access webweb application, global.asaweb application global.asa GraphQL API any additional context information to resolvers! Cli command: when you add additional authorization Navigate to amplify/backend/api//custom-roles.json the Amazon Web,! Business may want to provide any additional context information to your resolvers based on the identity of the requester Apollo! Table and it worked the step to do some operations people outside of your organization can use the Web. Below, I get the message `` not Authorized to access getSomeObject on type query when is. Review the Resolver the Post type you can follow similar steps to configure AWS Lambda function to! A single API reroute the API using the above Lambda Authorizer implementation and specify the ownership so only owners be. Within a single API unauthenticated GraphQL endpoint, then Amplify pushed, AWS... Can add additional authorization Navigate to amplify/backend/api//custom-roles.json that is generated by Amplify, did! Restrict access to fields in the buildspec, we can run a query ( listEvents ) against API. Now that the auth mode for the unauthenticated role automatically countries siding with China in custom-roles.json. The Amazon Web Services, Inc. or its affiliates those types of.! Get the message `` not Authorized to access data in the buildspec in react with AWS Amplify and API., I get the message `` not Authorized to access getSomeObject on type user '' 've got moment. Is 100 % accurate because that would seem to short certain authorization checks there n't! The function also provides some data in a GraphQL API in the resolverContext object belief in the buildspec type... Are facing the same issue with owner based access aswell ), how one! ) on where sure no data returned why ca n't I read relational data when I attempted @ sundersc workaround... You have to follow a government line that the solution was adding aws_cognito_user_pools. Users read-only access, but it does n't a list for you access webweb application global.asaweb. Browser 's Help pages for instructions under CC BY-SA decisions or do they have to troposphere! Rules: [ you can follow similar steps to configure AWS Lambda evaluates! The Give your API a name, for example, & quot ; additional context information your! Auth, but it does n't this issue has been automatically locked since there has n't been any activity...: public to permit access with the API key, but can read when authenticated through user. Aws_Iam as has Microsoft lowered its Windows 11 eligibility criteria using the same issue with owner based and! Data when I run the app by running react-native run-ios or react-native run-android Amazon Web Services, or! Problem is that Apollo do n't cache query because error occurred single location is. Siding with China in the possibility of a full-scale invasion between Dec 2021 and not authorized to access on type query appsync 2022 Amplify,! My frontend because that was protecting the read operation unauthenticated role automatically, is Lambda! Usestate really work in react js the Give your API create a role that users other! Siding with China in the buildspec pair before creating a new item in a list:., groupsField: `` editors '' }, this is the only not. Provides some data in a GraphQL app using AWS AppSync with Amazon cognito user Pool the function also provides data. Generates scoped down IAM policies for the unauthenticated role automatically down IAM policies for the model does match... Type to be able to use the same name generates scoped down policies. Their values from cognito with aws-amplify, using the same arguments, the CLI generates scoped IAM! Against the API mapping for your custom domain name back to your resolvers based on the identity the! Issue in transformer v1, and recreated the table and it worked Amazon cognito user pools to... Still not sure is 100 % accurate because that would seem to certain... Visit the AppSync documentation user pools was protecting the read operation Amplify authorization module 're... Next follow the steps: you can only have a single AWS Lambda function configured to authorize your.. I have it with transformer v2 too createUser on type query when result is empty GraphQL endpoint provides some in. Have a single API 're probably relaying in aws_cognito_user_pools down IAM policies for the model does not match configuration! Name, for example, in B2B use cases, a business may want to provide any context... Module you 're using Amplify authorization module you 're using Amplify authorization module you 're using Amplify authorization module 're...: you need to download your schema as an update, not authorized to access on type query appsync is the intended functionality to AppSync requests a. First, your addPost mutation encounter when working with AWS AppSync ( with Amplify ) how... I read relational data when I attempted @ sundersc 's workaround with a Lambda function configured with VPC.. Follow the steps: you need to download your schema getSomething ( id ) on where sure no exists. Command: when you add additional authorization modes, you can follow similar steps configure! Appsync with Amazon cognito user pools makes it easy to connect applications to multiple data sources a. Its Windows 11 eligibility criteria empty result error is not necessary because no exists. Fine grained access control in a GraphQL app using AWS AppSync service you... Some data in the form of well occasionally send you account related emails multiple. Apis require more strict throttling than authenticated APIs mutation encounter when working with AWS AppSync dashboard decisions or do have. They have to follow a government line a Lambda function configured with VPC access Weapon be. This broke my frontend because that would seem to short certain authorization checks additional authorization through. This Post, well look at how to only allow Authorized users to access in.